• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国高校百佳科技期刊
高级检索

评价国产利福平胶囊与参比制剂体外溶出一致性研究

张锦琳, 袁耀佐, 张娅, 赵述强, 赵恂, 张玫

张锦琳, 袁耀佐, 张娅, 赵述强, 赵恂, 张玫. 评价国产利福平胶囊与参比制剂体外溶出一致性研究[J]. 中国药科大学学报, 2018, 49(5): 603-609. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20180513
引用本文: 张锦琳, 袁耀佐, 张娅, 赵述强, 赵恂, 张玫. 评价国产利福平胶囊与参比制剂体外溶出一致性研究[J]. 中国药科大学学报, 2018, 49(5): 603-609. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20180513
ZHANG Jinlin, YUAN Yaozuo, ZHANG Ya, ZHAO Shuqiang, ZHAO Xun, ZHANG Mei. Consistency evaluation of domestic generic rifampicin capsules and reference drug in vitro[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2018, 49(5): 603-609. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20180513
Citation: ZHANG Jinlin, YUAN Yaozuo, ZHANG Ya, ZHAO Shuqiang, ZHAO Xun, ZHANG Mei. Consistency evaluation of domestic generic rifampicin capsules and reference drug in vitro[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2018, 49(5): 603-609. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20180513

评价国产利福平胶囊与参比制剂体外溶出一致性研究

Consistency evaluation of domestic generic rifampicin capsules and reference drug in vitro

  • 摘要: 评价国产利福平胶囊与参比制剂质量的一致性。参照《中华人民共和国药典》(2015版)对国产利福平胶囊与参比制剂的含量和有关物质进行考察,同时通过预实验与方法学验证确立溶出曲线测定基本方案,分别在pH 1.2盐酸溶液、pH 4.0磷酸盐缓冲液、pH 6.8磷酸盐缓冲液与纯水4种溶出介质中比较国产利福平胶囊与参比制剂间溶出曲线的相似性。结果显示,国产利福平胶囊与参比制剂的含量和有关物质均符合《中华人民共和国药典》(2015版)标准规定,但杂质谱结果显示国产利福平胶囊的杂质较少,特别是醌式利福平的含量远小于参比制剂;国产利福平胶囊与参比制剂体外溶出行为不一致,建议采用生物等效性试验对国产利福平胶囊与参比制剂的一致性进行进一步评价。
    Abstract: This study was to evaluate quality consistency of domestic generic and reference preparations. Content and related substances of domestic generic preparations and reference preparation were inspected according to Chinese Pharmacopeia 2015. Then the basic solution for determining dissolution curve was established through preliminary experiment and validation for determination. The dissolution curves of domestic rifampicin capsules and reference preparation were compared in four dissolution mediums: HCl(pH 1. 2), PBS(pH 4. 0), PBS(pH 6. 8)and pure water, respectively. Results showed that the content and related substances of domestic generic and reference preparations complied with the quality standard, but impurity profile displayed that impurities in domestic generic preparations were less than those in the reference preparation, with the content of rifampin quinine being especially less. Furthermore, dissolution of domestic generic and reference preparations were compared, and their dissolution curves were not similar. It is suggested that consistency between domestic rifampicin capsules and reference preparation should be evaluated by bioequivalence test.
  • [1] Duan ZH.Research progress of isoniazid and rifampicin on liver toxicity[J].J Mod Med(现代医学),2013,41(6):430-433.
    [2] Chinese Pharmacopeia Commission.Chinese Pharmacopeia:part 2(中华人民共和国药典:二部)[S].Beijing:China Medical Science Press,2015:498-499.
    [3] The United States Pharmacopieial Convention.The United States Pharmacopeia[S].40th ed.Baltimore:United Book Press,2017:6007-6009.
    [4] The British Pharmacopieial Commission.The British Pharmacopeia[S].London:The Stationery Office,2015:1058-1059.
    [5] Japanese Pharmacopoeia Commission.The Japanese Pharmacopeia[S].17th ed.Tokyo:Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Regulatory Science Society of Japan,2017:1518-1520.
    [6] European Pharmacopoeia Commission.European Pharmacopeia 9.0:volume Ⅱ[S].France:European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare,2017:3489-3490.
    [7] Yu QH.Consistency evaluation of generic drug in our country and original drug[J].Shanghai Med Pharm J(上海医药),2013,34(5):35-37.
    [8] Becker C,Dressman JB,Junqinqer HE,et al.Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms:rifampicin[J].J Pharm Sci,2009,98(7):2252-2267.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  876
  • HTML全文浏览量:  8
  • PDF下载量:  1300
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 刊出日期:  2018-10-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭