• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国高校百佳科技期刊
高级检索

采用重叠PCR构建高灵敏度酵母细胞传感器评估遗传毒性化合物

何颖, 夏星雅, 魏嘉利, 郑枫

何颖, 夏星雅, 魏嘉利, 郑枫. 采用重叠PCR构建高灵敏度酵母细胞传感器评估遗传毒性化合物[J]. 中国药科大学学报, 2021, 52(2): 236-244. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20210213
引用本文: 何颖, 夏星雅, 魏嘉利, 郑枫. 采用重叠PCR构建高灵敏度酵母细胞传感器评估遗传毒性化合物[J]. 中国药科大学学报, 2021, 52(2): 236-244. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20210213
HE Ying, XIA Xingya, WEI Jiali, ZHENG Feng. A highly sensitive yeast cell sensor constructed by overlap PCR was used to evaluate genotoxic compounds[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2021, 52(2): 236-244. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20210213
Citation: HE Ying, XIA Xingya, WEI Jiali, ZHENG Feng. A highly sensitive yeast cell sensor constructed by overlap PCR was used to evaluate genotoxic compounds[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2021, 52(2): 236-244. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20210213

采用重叠PCR构建高灵敏度酵母细胞传感器评估遗传毒性化合物

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.82073815)

A highly sensitive yeast cell sensor constructed by overlap PCR was used to evaluate genotoxic compounds

Funds: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82073815)
  • 摘要: 采用重叠PCR(overlap PCR)方法构建了pdr5snq2基因敲除组件,研究了pdr5snq2基因突变对酵母细胞传感器评估遗传毒性的影响。考察了野生型、pdr5单基因突变、snq2单基因突变与pdr5snq2双基因突变酵母细胞传感器暴露于系列浓度甲磺酸甲酯(MMS)、甲磺酸乙酯(EMS)、顺铂、4-硝基喹啉-N-氧化物(4NOQ)、5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)、羟基脲、水杨酸和葡萄糖溶液24 h后的细胞生长抑制情况与16 h后的荧光诱导情况。研究结果表明,overlap PCR方法能够高效率构建基因突变酵母细胞传感器;snq2单基因突变与pdr5snq2双基因突变细胞传感器检测遗传毒性的准确度为100%,高于野生型与pdr5单基因突变细胞传感器(87.5%);pdr5snq2双基因突变酵母细胞传感器表现出最高的遗传毒性检测灵敏度,为构建高准确度与灵敏度的酵母细胞传感器提供了思路与方法,为酵母细胞膜转运蛋白基因pdr5snq2的进一步功能研究奠定了基础。
    Abstract: pdr5 and snq2 gene knockout was constructed by overlap PCR, and the effects of pdr5 and snq2 mutations on the accuracy and sensitivity of RNR2 promoter-regulated yeast cell sensors in detecting genotoxic compounds were studied. The yeast cell sensors of wild-type, single-gene mutation of pdr5, single-gene mutation of snq2, and double-gene mutation of pdr5 and snq2 were studied. The cell growth inhibition and the fluorescence induction factor of the yeast cell sensors exposed to a series of concentrations of methyl methanesulfonate(MMS), ethyl methanesulfonate(EMS), cisplatin, 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide(4NOQ), 5-fluorouracil(5-FU), hydroxyurea, salicylic acid and glucose solution were investigated. The results showed that overlap PCR method could efficiently construct the mutant yeast cell sensor. The accuracy of cell sensors of single-gene mutation of snq2 and double-gene mutation of pdr5 and snq2 were both 100%, higher than that of cell sensors of wild-type and single-gene mutation of pdr5 (87.5%). The yeast cell sensor of double-gene mutation of pdr5 and snq2 showed the highest sensitivity in detecting genotoxicity. This study provides guidance for the construction of high accuracy and sensitivity yeast cell sensor, and foundation for further functional research of yeast cell membrane transporter gene pdr5 and snq2.
  • [1] . J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2018, 156: 307-312.
    [2] Sun YQ, Zhang XY, Yan YM, et al. Identification and genotoxicity evaluation of two carbamate impurities in rasagiline[J]. RSC Adv, 2016, 6(108): 106268-106274.
    [3] Xian ZR, Sun CM, Luo XF, et al. Profiling of genotoxic impurities in a lidocaine hydrochloride injection[J]. J China Pharm Univ(中国药科大学学报), 2020, 51(4): 466-471.
    [4] Friedberg EC. DNA damage and repair[J]. Nature, 2003, 421(6921): 436-440.
    [5] Jarque S, Bittner M, Blaha L, et al. Yeast biosensors for detection of environmental pollutants: current state and limitations[J]. Trends Biotechnol, 2016, 34(5): 408-419.
    [6] Lan J, Rahman SM, Gou N, et al. Genotoxicity assessment of drinking water disinfection byproducts by DNA damage and repair pathway profiling analysis[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2018, 52(11): 6565-6575.
    [7] Lan J, Hu M, Gao C, et al. Toxicity assessment of 4-methyl-1-cyclohexanemethanol and its metabolites in response to a recent chemical spill in west Virginia, USA[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2015, 49(10): 6284-6293.
    [8] Walmsley RM, Billinton N. How accurate is in vitro prediction of carcinogenicity?[J]. Br J Pharmacol, 2011, 162(6): 1250-1258.
    [9] Chen YL, Feng JJ, Yang HX, et al. Determination of genotoxic impurities of alkyl methanesulfonates in methanesulfonic acid by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry[J]. J China Pharm Univ(中国药科大学学报), 2020, 51(4): 472-478.
    [10] Eki T. Yeast-based genotoxicity tests for assessing DNA alterations and DNA stress responses: a 40-year overview[J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2018, 102(6): 2493-2507.
    [11] Lan JQ, Gou N, Rahman SM, et al. A quantitative toxicogenomics assay for high-throughput and mechanistic genotoxicity assessment and screening of environmental pollutants[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2016, 50(6): 3202-3214.
    [12] Bui VN, Nguyen TTH, Mai CT, et al. Procarcinogens - determination and evaluation by yeast-based biosensor transformed with plasmids incorporating RAD54 reporter construct and cytochrome P450 genes[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(12): e0168721.
    [13] Mewes HW, Albermann K, B?hr M, et al. Overview of the yeast genome[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6632 suppl): 7-65.
    [14] Sancar A, Lindsey-Boltz LA, Unsal-Ka?maz K, et al. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints[J]. Annu Rev Biochem, 2004, 73: 39-85.
    [15] Bui VN, Nguyen TTH, Bettarel Y, et al. Genotoxicity of chemical compounds identification and assessment by yeast cells transformed with GFP reporter constructs regulated by the PLM2 or DIN7 promoter[J]. Int J Toxicol, 2015, 34(1): 31-43.
    [16] Nordlund P, Reichard P. Ribonucleotide reductases[J]. Annu Rev Biochem, 2006, 75(1): 681-706.
    [17] Lu Y, Tian Y, Wang R, et al. Dual fluorescent protein-based bioassay system for the detection of genotoxic chemical substances in Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. Toxicol Mech Methods, 2015, 25(9): 698-707.
    [18] Dimitrov M, Venkov P, Pesheva M. The positive response of Ty1 retrotransposition test to carcinogens is due to increased levels of reactive oxygen species generated by the genotoxins[J]. Arch Toxicol, 2011, 85(1): 67-74.
    [19] Wei T, Zhang C, Xu X, et al. Construction and evaluation of two biosensors based on yeast transcriptional response to genotoxic chemicals[J]. Biosens Bioelectron, 2013, 44: 138-145.
    [20] Li C, Lou H. From gene editing to genome reconstitution: evolving techniques in yeast[J]. Hereditas(遗传), 2015, 37(10): 1021-1028.
    [21] Blagus T, Zager V, Cemazar M, et al. A cell-based biosensor system HepG2CDKN1A-DsRed for rapid and simple detection of genotoxic agents[J]. Biosens Bioelectron, 2014, 61: 102-111.
  • 期刊类型引用(0)

    其他类型引用(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  136
  • HTML全文浏览量:  6
  • PDF下载量:  545
  • 被引次数: 1
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-11-15
  • 修回日期:  2021-01-08
  • 刊出日期:  2021-04-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭