基于<i>Z</i>指数模型的药学科研人员代表作评析

丁佐奇; 李芙蓉; 孙劲楠; 郝海平

doi:10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20210414

基于Z指数模型的药学科研人员代表作评析

1.
中国药科大学理学院，南京 210009
2.
中国药科大学《中国天然药物》编辑部，南京 210009
3.
中国药科大学药学院，南京 210009

基金项目: 2021年度江苏省社科应用研究精品工程人才发展专项课题资助项目（No.21SRB-17）

计量
- 文章访问数: 141
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 539
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-07-06
- 修回日期: 2021-08-15
- 刊出日期: 2021-08-24

Evaluation of representative research works in pharmaceutical field based on Z-index model

1.
School of Science, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009
2.
Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009
3.
School of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China

Funds: This study was supported by the Talent Development Project of Social Science Applied Research in Jiangsu Province in 2021(No.21SRB-17)

摘要

摘要: 探究一种基于论文学术认可度的代表作筛选方法的可行性。通过比较分析representative法、h指数核心法、职称申报者主观选择结果和本研究建立的学术认可度法(一区期刊-学科领域百分位-学科规范化引文影响力,Q1-PSA-CNCI)的优劣势,将得到的代表作分别引入Z指数后形成Z_h、Z_r和Z_q指数,并分析各指标之间的相关性。相较于其他方法,Q1-PSACNCI法得到的代表作数量更为合理。各指标间存在显著的相关性(P <0.05),并且Zq指数在参与评定不同职称的教授中也不存在显著性差异(P> 0.05)。研究表明,Q1-PSA-CNCI法能够帮助筛选代表作且相较于另外两种方法筛选出的代表作数量更为合理,Zq指数可作为代表作评定的指标为论文定性评价提供参考,同行评审采用"小同行"完善评审过程更为合理。
- 代表作评价 /
- 代表作筛选 /
- Z指数 /
- Z_q指数 /
- h指数核心法 /
- Q1-PSA-CNCI
Abstract: This paper aims to explore the feasibility of establishing a representative work screening method based on the academic recognition of the paper. Through comparative analysis of the strong and weak points of representative method, h-index core method, the subjective selection results by faculty applying for higher professional titles, and the academic recognition method established in this research (Q1 Journal-Percentile in Subject Area-Category Normalized Citation Impact, Q1-PSA-CNCI), representative works were introduced into the Z-index to form the Z_h, Z_r and Z_q-index, and the correlations between the indicators were analyzed. Compared with other methods, the number of representative works obtained by the Q1-PSA-CNCI method is more reasonable. There was significant correlation among the indicators (P < 0.05), with no significant difference in the Z_q-index among faculty evaluated for different professional titles (P > 0.05). Studies have shown that the Q1-PSA-CNCI method could help to screen representative works and was more reasonable than the number of representative works selected based on the other two methods, so Z_q-index could be used as an indicator for representative work evaluation to provide reference for the qualitative evaluation of papers. It is more reasonable to improve the review process with the participation of "small peers".
- representative work evaluation /
- representative work selection /
- Z-index /
- Z_q-index /
- h-index core method /
- Q1-PSA-CNCI

HTML全文

参考文献(20)

[1]	.（2018-07-03）［2021-01-10］. http：//www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-07/03/content_5303251.htm.
[2]	Ministry of Science and Technology of the People′s Republic of China.Measures to Get Rid of the Bad Orientation of ‘Paper Only’ in Science and Technology Evaluation （Trial）［EB /OL］.（2020-02-23）［2021-01-10］. http：//www.scio.gov.cn/xwfbh/gbwxwfbh/xwfbh/kjb/Document/1676327/1676327.htm.
[3]	Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China.Opinions on Standardizing the Use of Relevant Indicators of SCI Papers in Colleges and Universities and Establishing a Correct Evaluation Orientation［EB /OL］.（2020-03-03）［2021-01-10］. http：//www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/moe_784/202002/t20200223_423334.html.
[4]	Zhang S，Zhang Y. Feasibility study on teacher evaluation mechanism under "academic masterpiece" system［J］.Chin Univ Sci Tech（中国高校科技），2020（4）：27-30.
[5]	Sun JN，Ding ZQ. Research on the evaluation of university teachers′ representative works based on Z-index［J］.Pharm Edu（药学教育），2021，37（1）：1-6.
[6]	Bornmann L，Mutz R.Futher steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance：the avoidance of citation（ration）averages in field-normalization［J］.J Informetr，2011，5（1）：228-230.
[7]	Liu XL，Shen L，Guo J，et al. Method for selecting scholars′ representative works by baselines of citations：based on the articles of Henan provincial scholars［J］.Chin J Sci Tech Period（中国科技期刊研究），2020，31（8）：941-947.
[8]	Hirsch JE. An Index to Quantify an individual′s scientific research output［J］. P Natl Acad Sci U S A，2005，102（46）：16569-16572.
[9]	Zhu GX.The Limitations of h-index in scientific research evaluation & their countermeasures［J］.Inform Stud：Theory Appl（情报理论与实践），2009，32（11）：1-2，7.
[10]	Zhou CL. The hidden defect of H-index：study of accurate H-index injection［J］.Libr Inform Sci（图书情报工作），2008（8）：112-114，65.
[11]	Lv N.Analysis of the H-index dynamic changing trend of scientific research personnel［J］. Inform Stud：Theory Appl（情报理论与实践），2015，38（5）：112-115.
[12]	Yu LP.On the time evolution of academic journals′ h-index： taking studies in science of science as example［J］.J Intel（情报杂志），2015，34（1）：96-99.
[13]	Zhai L ， Yan X ， Zhu B. The Hl-index： improvement of H-index based on quality of citing papers［J］. Scientometrics， 2014， 98（2）：1021-1031.
[14]	Egghe L.An improvement of the h-index： the G-index［J］.Newsletter，2006，2（1）：8-9.
[15]	Prathap G．The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index［J］.Scientometrics，2010，84（1）：167-172.
[16]	Prathap G. The zynergy-index and the formula for the h-index［J］. J Assoc Inf Sci Tech， 2014， 65（2）：426-427.
[17]	Zhou J， Zeng A， Fan Y，et al. The representative works of scientists［J］.Scientometrics，2018，117（3）：1721-1732.
[18]	Zhang XM. Research on the modification to Z index research academic evaluation method based on representative work system［J］.Libr Sci Res Work（图书馆研究与工作），2020（1）：22-28.
[19]	Li FR， Ding ZQ. Evaluation of representative papers： based on Nobel prize papers［J］. Sci Focus（科学观察）， 2021，16（4）： 40-52.
[20]	Ding ZQ，Zheng XN. Analysis on the contradiction between journal influencing factors， citation times and academic quality evaluation［J］. Chin J Sci Tech Period（中国科技期刊研究），2009，20（2）：286-288.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

计量

文章访问数: 141
HTML全文浏览量: 5
PDF下载量: 539
被引次数: 0

基于Z指数模型的药学科研人员代表作评析

计量

出版历程

Evaluation of representative research works in pharmaceutical field based on Z-index model

计量

出版历程

目录