• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国高校百佳科技期刊
高级检索

“双一流”背景下高校学科科研产出评价体系研究——基于药理学与毒理学学科的实证研究

孙劲楠, 杨榕, 丁佐奇

孙劲楠, 杨榕, 丁佐奇. “双一流”背景下高校学科科研产出评价体系研究——基于药理学与毒理学学科的实证研究[J]. 中国药科大学学报, 2022, 53(2): 245-252. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20220216
引用本文: 孙劲楠, 杨榕, 丁佐奇. “双一流”背景下高校学科科研产出评价体系研究——基于药理学与毒理学学科的实证研究[J]. 中国药科大学学报, 2022, 53(2): 245-252. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20220216
SUN Jinnan, YANG Rong, DING Zuoqi. Systematic evaluation of scientific research output for disciplines of "Double First-Class" universities:an empirical case of the discipline of pharmacology and toxicology[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2022, 53(2): 245-252. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20220216
Citation: SUN Jinnan, YANG Rong, DING Zuoqi. Systematic evaluation of scientific research output for disciplines of "Double First-Class" universities:an empirical case of the discipline of pharmacology and toxicology[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2022, 53(2): 245-252. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20220216

“双一流”背景下高校学科科研产出评价体系研究——基于药理学与毒理学学科的实证研究

基金项目: 江苏省研究生创新计划2021年度一般项目资助(No.KYCX21_0651);中国药科大学“十四五”发展战略暨全面深化改革研究2021年度课题资助项目

Systematic evaluation of scientific research output for disciplines of "Double First-Class" universities:an empirical case of the discipline of pharmacology and toxicology

Funds: This study was supported by Jiangsu Province Postgraduate Innovation Program General Project "Research on Comprehensive Evaluation system of University Teachers" in 2021 (No.KYCX21_0651) and the Development Strategy of China Pharmaceutical University during the Fourteenth Five-Year Plan and the Subject of Comprehensively Deepening Reform Research in 2021
  • 摘要: 为推进一流学科建设,探索构建多维度学科评估体系,对学科发展提供建议。利用基本科学指标数据库(ESI)、InCites和Derwent Innovation Index数据库,借助极差变换法和熵权法对药理学与毒理学领域部分高校的指标数据情况进行分析,研究指标体系的构建途径和指标表现。研究表明,样本高校在指标体系中的得分与ESI排名表现不同,指标体系具有一定的实际应用价值。ESI学科排名不能完整地反映学科发展情况,多维度指标评价体系能在一定程度上克服这一缺陷。本文建立了以论文和专利为主要评价对象的评价体系,尽可能涵盖科研产出的多角度指标,弥补单一或少数指标体系的信息缺失。建议高校可从致力发表高质量原创研究成果、主导或广泛参与科研合作、加强校企合作注重成果转化、推进开放科学鼓励开放获取等角度制定学科发展计划。
    Abstract: To promote the construction of first-class disciplines of "Double First-Class" universities in China, the construction of a comprehensive evaluation system was explored, so as to provide suggestions for the development of these disciplines.Essential Science Indicators (ESI), InCites and Derwent Innovation Index databases, together with range transformation method and entropy weight method, were employed to analyze the data in the field of pharmacology and toxicology from some universities; the construction approaches and index performance of the system were studied. The score performances of the sample universities in the index system are different from their ESI rankings, suggesting that the system has certain practical value.ESI rankings cannot fully reflect the development levels of disciplines, while the multi-dimensional index evaluation system can overcome this shortcoming to a certain extent.This paper establishes an evaluation system with published papers and granted patents as the main evaluation objects, covering as many multi-angle indicators of scientific research output as possible, and trying to overcome the disadvantages due to lack of information in a single or few index systems.It is suggested that universities should formulate their discipline development plans from the perspectives of publishing high-quality original research results, leading or widely participating in scientific research cooperation, strengthening university-enterprise cooperation, promoting the application of research results, promoting open science and encouraging open access.
  • [1] .[2021-06-29]. https://www.csdp.edu.cn/article/2082.html.
    [2] Matveeva N,Sterligov I,Yudkevich M. The effect of Russian University Excellence Initiative on publications and collaboration patterns[J]. J Informetr,2021,15(1):101110.
    [3] Xinhua News Agency. Xi Jinping attended the National Education Conference and delivered an important speech[EB/OL].[2021-06-29].http://www.banyuetan.org/jrt/detail/20180911/1000200033134991536632028299959736_1.html.
    [4] Xu R,Wei YC,Li WJ. Study on insights gained from the international disciplinary ranking index system on the development of Chinese pharmaceutical disciplines—based on the comparative analysis of ARWU,US News,QS and THE discipline rankings[J]. J China Pharm Univ(中国药科大学学报),2020,51(2):240-248.
    [5] Cheng Y. The methodology and features of Shanghai ranking''s best Chinese universities ranking[J]. Shanghai J Educ Eval(上海教育评估研究),2017,6(3):35-39.
    [6] Ni XR,Guo XX. Research on discipline evaluation index system under the construction of "Double first-class"[J].Chin Univ Sci Technol(中国高校科技),2021(Z1):15-19.
    [7] Zhou GL,Cai SF,Xu XC,et al. Construction and evaluation of world-class universities:international experience and Chinese exploration[J]. China High Educ Res(中国高教研究),2019(9):22-28,34.
    [8] Wang YQ,Ding ZQ. Analysis and Enlightenment of ESI related indicators of medical disciplines in Colleges and universities in China under the background of "Double first-class"[J]. Acta Univ Med Nanjing (Soc Sci)[南京医科大学学报(社会科学版)],2019,19(04):335-340.
    [9] of China MOE. Work plan for the fifth round of discipline evaluation[EB/OL].(2020-11-03)[2021-10-25].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/moe_1946/fj_2020/202011/t20201102_497819. html.
    [10] Herrera-Vallejera D,Gorbea-Portal S. Pharmacology and Pharmacy:research and innovation analysis[J]. Scientometrics,2021,126(3):2513-2522.
    [11] Chi GT. The science and technology evaluation model based on entropy weight and empirical research during the 10th five-year of China[J]. Chin J Manage(管理学报),2010,7(1):34-42.
    [12] Luo H,Zhou J. ESI discipline classification and evaluation defects and their risks[J]. Jiangsu Higher Edu(江苏高教),2018(11):55-59,63.
    [13] Fan LP,Wang YF,Ding SC,et al. Productivity trends and citation impact of different institutional collaboration patterns at the research units’ level[J]. Scientometrics,2020,125(2):1179-1196.
    [14] Abramo G,D’Angelo CA,di Costa F. On the relation between the degree of internationalization of cited and citing publications:a field level analysis,including and excluding self-citations[J]. J Informetr,2021,15(1):101101.
    [15] Chang YW. Characteristics of high research performance authors in the field of library and information science and those of their articles[J]. Scientometrics,2021,126(4):3373-3391.
    [16] Rubbo P,Pilatti LA,Picinin CT. Citation of retracted articles in engineering:a study of the web of science database[J]. Ethics Behavior,2019,29(8):661-679.
    [17] Li HX,Liu LJ,Wang XW. The open access effect in social media exposure of scholarly articles:a matched-pair analysis[J]. J Informetr,2021,15(3):101154.
    [18] Ding ZQ,Hao HP. Analysis of the correlation between Altmetrics and traditional measurement indicators and its enlightenment to the dissemination of scientific and technological journals [J]. Sci Technol Pub(科技与出版),2019(11):134-139.
    [19] Woolston C. Impact factor abandoned by Dutch university in hiring and promotion decisions[J]. Nature,2021,595(7867):462.
    [20] Erfanmanesh M,Teixeira da Silva JA. Is the soundness-only quality control policy of open access mega journals linked to a higher rate of published errors[J]?Scientometrics,2019,120(2):917-923.
    [21] Ding ZQ. Science and technology journals multi-dimensional to help scientific and technological innovation and "double-class" construction[J]. Sci Technol Pub(科技与出版),2018(9):11-15.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  215
  • HTML全文浏览量:  8
  • PDF下载量:  378
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-10-24
  • 修回日期:  2022-03-10
  • 刊出日期:  2022-04-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭