• 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国高校百佳科技期刊
  • 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库核心期刊
Advanced Search
XIAO Ting, MA Bufang, WANG Chen, YAO Shangchen, FENG Yanchun, NING Baoming. Evaluation on measurement uncertainty of correction factors of fluconazole impurities determined by HPLC standard curve method[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2022, 53(3): 306-313. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20220308
Citation: XIAO Ting, MA Bufang, WANG Chen, YAO Shangchen, FENG Yanchun, NING Baoming. Evaluation on measurement uncertainty of correction factors of fluconazole impurities determined by HPLC standard curve method[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2022, 53(3): 306-313. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20220308

Evaluation on measurement uncertainty of correction factors of fluconazole impurities determined by HPLC standard curve method

More Information
  • Received Date: March 29, 2022
  • Revised Date: May 10, 2022
  • In this paper, the uncertainties of correction factors of fluconazole impurities determined by HPLC standard curve method were evaluated, and the main common factors affecting the accuracy of standard curve method were found, so as to improve the accuracy of the method.In this study, the corresponding fitting lines of fluconazole and its impurities A, B, C, D, F and I were established respectively, and the ratio of the slope of fitting lines of each impurity and its corresponding principal component was calculated as the correction factor of the impurity.Then on the basis of GUM method, the uncertainty of each impurity correction factor determined by standard curve method was evaluated according to the established uncertainty evaluation scheme of correction factor determination process.The correction factor and uncertainty of fluconazole impurities A, B, C, D, F and I were 1.068 ± 0.046, 0.102 ± 0.005, 0.0582 ± 0.0031, 1.382 ± 0.121, 0.802 ± 0.067 and 1.383 ± 0.119, respectively, and the coverage factor k was 2.Finally, the contribution rate of each uncertainty component was calculated.In the relative combined standard uncertainties urel(f) of fluconazole impurities A, B, C, D, F and I correction factors, the sum of contribution rate of slope uncertainty urel(K) of the linear equation of principal component and its impurity is more than 85%; in the slope uncertainties urel(K) of linear equation, the contribution rates of uncertainties of solution concentration in 8 of 12 data groups are more than 80%, and the contribution rates of uncertainties introduced by reference substance content in solution concentration are about 80%.It can be seen that the preparation of linear solution concentration is the most influential factor in the determination of impurity correction factor by standard curve method, followed by the linear fitting process.In the preparation process of linear solution concentration, the purity of reference substance is the most influential factor, followed by weighing and pipetting times.The conclusion can help the experimenters to better formulate experimental plans and ensure the accuracy of the results when doing similar work.
  • [1]
    . Beijing:China Medical Science and Technology Press,2020:64.
    [2]
    The United States Pharmacopeial Convention. United States Pharmacopoeia:volume 5[S]. Baltimore:United Book Press[S]. 2019:8047.
    [3]
    Yu ZX,Yu LJ,Huang HW,et al. Discussion on the calculation methods of the known impurities in related substances determined by HPLC[J]. Drug Stand China(中国药品标准),2010,11(4):278-282.
    [4]
    Xiao T,Wang C,Yao SC,et al. Application of an HPLC correction factor method in pharmaceutical analysis[J]. Acta Pharm Sin(药学学报),2020,55(12):2854-2861.
    [5]
    Wang K,Sun P,Ma Y,et al. Determination of diketo aldehyde in dihydroartemisinin bulk drug by principal component reference substances external standard method with correction factor[J]. Chin Pharm J(中国药学杂志),2020,55(1):52-57.
    [6]
    Gu YP,Yang Y,Li M,et al. Research and determination of related substances in trapidil[J]. Chin J Pharm Anal(药物分析杂志),2021,41(12):2122-2131.
    [7]
    Liu P,Hu LM,Tian HN,et al. HPLC method for determination of hydroxylated cefaclor impurities[J]. Chin J Antibiot(中国抗生素杂志),2022,47(1):48-54.
    [8]
    Ni YC. Practical Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty(实用测量不确定度评定)[M]. 5th ed. Beijing:China Quality Inspection Press and China Standards Press,2016:15-83.
    [9]
    Chai ZL,Yuan CX,Zhou XK,et al. Measurement uncertainty was evaluated in determination of profenofos (PFF) residues in cucumber by gas chromatography(GC)[J]. Sci Technol Food Ind(食品工业科技),2020,41(12):238-244.
    [10]
    Xiao T,Wang C,Yao SC,et al. Evaluation on measurement uncertainty of impurity correction factor determined by HPLC standard curve method[J]. Chin J Antibiot(中国抗生素杂志),2021,46(4):271-278.
    [11]
    Wan K,Zhang YY,Zhou CH,et al. Recent advances in antifungal fluconazole[J]. Chin J Antibiot(中国抗生素杂志),2012,37(1):8-20.
    [12]
    Yao SC,Chang Y,Hu CQ. Study of uncertainty of β-lactam antibiotics chemical reference substance being used in HPLC[J]. Chin J Pharm Anal(药物分析杂志),2010,30(11):2104-2110.
    [13]
    Liu SY,Hu CQ. A comparative uncertainty study of the calibration of macrolide antibiotic reference standards using quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance and mass balance methods[J]. Anal Chim Acta,2007,602(1):114-121.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LI Yue, XU Kai, YANG Rui, YANG Huiying. Application of ultra-high performance convergence chromatography-tandem quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry in the analysis of Span composition[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2024, 55(6): 742-749. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.2024010502
    [2]LI Yan, JIA Huanhuan, HUANG Qing, YUAN Yaozuo, CHEN Minhui, ZHANG Jinlin. Impurity spectra of lansoprazole enteric-coated preparations by high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution orbital trap mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2023, 54(5): 577-585. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.2023042601
    [3]HU Zhaoliang, ZOU Wenyu, SONG Min, HANG Taijun, LU Yuting. Correlation between in-vivo mercury exposure from Cinnabaris and memory disorders in juvenile rat[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2023, 54(4): 483-489. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.2023042603
    [4]YU Lili, CHU Tingting, HOU Chenzhi, WANG Youmei, DI Bin. Quantitative determination of 10 illicit drugs in wastewater by liquid-liquid extraction-ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2021, 52(6): 707-712. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20210608
    [5]XIE Feng, LI Zhan-bin, TAN Hong, WANG Yan-jiao. Determination of chromium in capsule shells by ultrasonic wave promoting dissolution-graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2012, 43(3): 281-282.
    [6]SHEN Wei-yang, ZHONG Shao-peng, CHEN Jian-qiu. Interaction between silicotungstic acid,silicon tungsten-cobalt heteropoly acid and bovine serum albumin by fluorescence spectrometry[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2011, 42(2): 131-135.
    [7]Determination of Arsenic in Chinese Herbal Extract by Flow Injection-Hydride Generation-Atomic Absorption Spectrometry[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2003, (4): 48-50.
    [8]Determination of Trace Arsenic in Spirulina plaensis Tablets by Flow Injection Hydride Generation Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 1998, (6): 473-474.
    [9]Determination of Arsenic in Chinese Traditional Patent Drug XINLINGWAN by Zeeman Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 1995, (2): 94-96.
    [10]Determination of 11 Metal Elements in Chinese Traditional Medicine by Use of Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 1991, (1): 33-35.

Catalog

    Article views (151) PDF downloads (343) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return